Halve model of INJS
Liquidity and value consensus are almost the entire life of a token. As the first inscription of the INJRC20 protocol in the INJ network, our value and consensus are crucial. A good token economic model will have a significant impact on INJS, just as the halving cycles of Bitcoin attract attention to INJS. In terms of minting costs, early participants incur lower costs. The fluctuation of minting costs will also have a direct impact on the price of INJS.
The following is a theoretical chart depicting the relationship between minting cost, supply, and market value.
| Mint cost(INJ) | Limit | Circulating supply(M) | Theoretical market value(USDT) |
|---|---|---|---|
0.03 | 2000.0 | 1000.0 | $600,000.00 |
0.03 | 1000.0 | 1500.0 | $1,800,000.00 |
0.03 | 500.0 | 1750.0 | $4,200,000.00 |
0.03 | 250.0 | 1875.0 | $9,000,000.00 |
0.03 | 125.0 | 1937.5 | $18,600,000.00 |
0.03 | 62.5 | 1968.8 | $37,800,000.00 |
Of course, this is just a simple calculation of market value and supply based on real-time minting costs. The actual market is complex and presents numerous possibilities, and there is infinite risk in any investment at any time. Please carefully consider the potential risks involved. You may choose not to participate in minting INJS and refrain from buying INJS at any time.
Last updated